Standard Exploration Ltd. (TSX-V: STD) announced the appointment of Neil Burrows as Vice President Finance and Chief Financial Officer.
Bowmore Exploration Ltd. (TSX-V: BOW) announced the appointment of Martin Nicoletti as Chief Financial Officer. Since 2004, he has been involved with public junior mining companies carrying exploration activities worldwide, with responsibilities in financial controls and reporting. Mr. Nicoletti replaces Richard Grass who acted as interim Chief Financial Officer during a transition period. Mr. Grass will remain as Chairman of the Audit Committee.
Athabasca Minerals Inc. (TSX-V: ABM) announced the appointment of Don Hruba as the Company's Chief Financial Officer (CFO). He most recently served as Vice President, Finance & Administration for a large Canadian publishing and distributing company.
Western Plains Petroleum Ltd. (TSX-V: WPP) announce that Steven Glover has been appointed by the Board of Directors as Vice-President, Finance, and Chief Financial Officer. Mr. Glover previously was Vice-President, Finance, with TSX Venture Exchange listed entities Valiant Energy Inc. (2005 - 2006) and Eagle Rock Exploration Ltd. (2006 - 2009). Mr. Glover currently serves as a Director and Chair of the Audit Committee for Travel Alberta, and also provides consulting financial advisory services to private corporations, partnerships and income trusts. Throughout his career, Mr. Glover has remained active in various professional accounting organizations, serving as a Director of the Canadian Public Accountability Board (2003 - 2005) and as an Executive Director of the Institute of Chartered Accountants of Alberta (1984 - 2005).
RTN Stealth Software Inc. (CNSX: RTN, OTCBB: RTNSF, FWB: 8RT) announced that John Doma has been appointed the Company's CFO, following the resignation of Larry Tsang.
Verafin, Inc. announced that Brian G. Whiteway has joined the company as chief financial officer. Prior to Verafin, Mr. Whiteway held positions as vice president, chief financial officer and chief operating officer at International Communications & Navigation (ICAN) Limited. Before ICAN, Mr. Whiteway was senior manager of mergers and acquisitions at Bell - Aliant Inc. He has also held management positions with the Business Development Bank of Canada and Scotiabank.
Blackdog Resources Ltd. (TSX-V: DOG) announced the appointment of James W. White as Chief Financial Officer of the Company. Mr. White replaces Linda Legere-Tetzlaff, who has tendered her resignation as Chief Financial Officer of the Company.
Deploy Technologies Inc. (OTC: DPLY), announced that the company has appointed Wisdom Ncube as Chief Financial Officer of the company.
Merc International Minerals Inc. (TSX-V: MRK) announced the appointment of Michael G. Leskovec to the position of Chief Financial Officer. Mr. Leskovec replaces Thomas Pladsen as Chief Financial Officer, who remains as a director. Mr. Leskovec is also the Chief Financial Officer of White Pine Resources Inc., as well as the Financial Control Officer of Northfield Capital Corporation. Most recently, Mr. Leskovec was Corporate Controller and an Officer of Andina Minerals Inc. From May 2007 through September 2008, Mr. Leskovec served as Controller and an Officer of Gold Eagle Mines Ltd which was sold to Goldcorp Inc. in September 2008 for $1.5 billion.
Ridgeline Energy Services Inc. (TSX-V: RLE) announced the appointment of Jim Maldaner as Chief Financial Officer, replacing John Longley. Mr. Maldaner is a Chartered Accountant and a Partner located in the Calgary office of DNTW LLP, Chartered Accountants.
Canadian Solar Inc. (NASDAQ: CSIQ) announced the appointment of Andrew Chen as Chief Financial Officer, replacing Arthur Chien, who will continue as a special advisor to the CEO's office until the end of the year. Before joining Canadian Solar, Mr. Chen served as Chief Financial Officer of different NASDAQ listed companies.
If you have news about CFOs on the move, or any comments on this feature, please email us.
Showing posts with label IFRS. Show all posts
Showing posts with label IFRS. Show all posts
Sunday, October 17, 2010
Monday, October 4, 2010
Are you ready to give up your CA for a CPA?
If you are a Canadian CA, there is a good chance you worked hard for it, and are quite proud of the designation. I know I worked hard for it, and I am proud CA.
Buried in my emails recently I found a letter from Bill MacKinnon, FCA, Chair of the CICA Board of Directors discussing two points of concern for the future of our profession that came up out of a recent meeting of leaders’ of our profession.
The first point of concern for our leaders, which addresses “Pathways into the CA Profession in Canada” is continuing down the slippery slope that was created when the CICA started accepting training for new professionals outside of an audit firm environment. While I do have concerns in this area, this is currently overshadowed the 2nd point of concern – A Canadian CPA. (Click here to view the new logo).
Yes. That’s right. The leaders of our profession are considering a Canadian CPA designation.
As a CA, I have been proud of the efforts in past years to brand the CA designation as the premier accounting designation in Canada (and the world). Now it seems that globalization of the accounting profession (which most recently has Canadian GAAP being replaced by International GAAP – IFRS) has made our leaders hedge our bets on our historic name and brand, just in case we need to “start consolidating into one or two global professions”.
What the future holds for Canadian CAs and the constituents we serve is currently unclear. It is not clear as to whether we can currently call ourselves CA, CPA or both together.
A few years back when the profession in its wisdom wanted to merge with the other accounting professions in Canada, our members were very clear that it was not what the grass roots members wanted.
My initial reaction to this development is: “I’m not interested, but I am willing to listen - you’ll have to convince me.” I believe that many CAs will have the same reaction. I hope that the leaders of our profession ensure that they properly consult with the CA members across the country, and not just make an administrative decision that deeply affects our attachment to our profession and to our brand.
What is your reaction?
Buried in my emails recently I found a letter from Bill MacKinnon, FCA, Chair of the CICA Board of Directors discussing two points of concern for the future of our profession that came up out of a recent meeting of leaders’ of our profession.
The first point of concern for our leaders, which addresses “Pathways into the CA Profession in Canada” is continuing down the slippery slope that was created when the CICA started accepting training for new professionals outside of an audit firm environment. While I do have concerns in this area, this is currently overshadowed the 2nd point of concern – A Canadian CPA. (Click here to view the new logo).
Yes. That’s right. The leaders of our profession are considering a Canadian CPA designation.
As a CA, I have been proud of the efforts in past years to brand the CA designation as the premier accounting designation in Canada (and the world). Now it seems that globalization of the accounting profession (which most recently has Canadian GAAP being replaced by International GAAP – IFRS) has made our leaders hedge our bets on our historic name and brand, just in case we need to “start consolidating into one or two global professions”.
What the future holds for Canadian CAs and the constituents we serve is currently unclear. It is not clear as to whether we can currently call ourselves CA, CPA or both together.
A few years back when the profession in its wisdom wanted to merge with the other accounting professions in Canada, our members were very clear that it was not what the grass roots members wanted.
My initial reaction to this development is: “I’m not interested, but I am willing to listen - you’ll have to convince me.” I believe that many CAs will have the same reaction. I hope that the leaders of our profession ensure that they properly consult with the CA members across the country, and not just make an administrative decision that deeply affects our attachment to our profession and to our brand.
What is your reaction?
Wednesday, July 21, 2010
Prediction: The Perfect Storm
Take the following ingredients:
- The recession is over.
- IFRS deadline approaching (January 1, 2011), with no turning back.
- Companies are hiring in finance again.
- Accounting Firms coming off the busiest busy season in years.
- Accounting professionals are leaving firms to start their own firms
Mix them together, and you have…
The biggest shortage of staff facing Accounting Firms in Canada (Big 4 and mid-tier) since 2003-2004.
Coming Soon to an Accounting Firm near you - September or October 2010.
(Please note that this Storm is predicted for Canada only).
- The recession is over.
- IFRS deadline approaching (January 1, 2011), with no turning back.
- Companies are hiring in finance again.
- Accounting Firms coming off the busiest busy season in years.
- Accounting professionals are leaving firms to start their own firms
Mix them together, and you have…
The biggest shortage of staff facing Accounting Firms in Canada (Big 4 and mid-tier) since 2003-2004.
Coming Soon to an Accounting Firm near you - September or October 2010.
(Please note that this Storm is predicted for Canada only).
Thursday, March 6, 2008
Collateral Damage? US GAAP’s use in Canada may no longer be accepted
In November 2007, the United States Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) accepted foreign issuers to prepare their financial statements using IFRS. This will allow Canadian companies, once IFRS compliant, to file their financial statements for SEC purposes without any additional changes or reconciliations.
(Read our previous article on IFRS here).
In February, The Canadian Securities Administration (CSA) released a Concept Paper on the possible changes to Securities Rules relating to IFRS. In this Concept Paper, they are considering no longer allowing Canadian companies to report in US GAAP for Canadian Securities purposes. Having heard about this, we thought we would let our comments known to the CSA. Attached is the Question from the Concept Paper, as well as our response.
If this subject is of interest to you, we highly recommend that you read the Concept Paper. Should this concern you, we recommend that you let your thoughts known to the CSA – the deadline for comments is April 13, 2008.
__________________________________________________________________
Question: Do you agree we should not allow a SEC issuer to use US GAAP for financial years beginning on or after January 1, 2009, with the exception that a SEC issuer filing US GAAP financial statements in Canada for its most recent financial year ending on or before December 31, 2008, could continue doing so until 2013? If not, why do you disagree, and how, if at all, would you modify existing rules?
Answer:
No, we do not agree.
Reason 1. We disagree for sound business reasons. While Canada is choosing an honourable position to converge accounting standards internationally, Canadian companies continue to access significant capital in the Unites States. Companies currently choose to report in US GAAP for business reasons – mostly because investors in the United States prefer to invest in companies that report in US GAAP. Taking away the opportunity for Canadian companies to report only in US GAAP would only be increasing their costs by having to report in IFRS for Canadian purposes and US GAAP (chosen for appropriate access to capital markets).
Reason 2. We have found the SEC decision to accept IFRS for foreign issuers a great step towards the admirable goal of one GAAP acceptable worldwide. It is important to note that winds of change continue to blow through the United States, from internationalist to protectionist and back again. Considering the speed in which the SEC has moved towards acceptance of IFRS for foreign issuers, we are concerned that political events could cause the SEC to change its mind just as quickly on the acceptance of IFRS for foreign issuers. Because of this risk, Canadian companies must be able to choose to continue to report in US GAAP.
We would not propose to modify existing rules for reporting in US GAAP.
(Read our previous article on IFRS here).
In February, The Canadian Securities Administration (CSA) released a Concept Paper on the possible changes to Securities Rules relating to IFRS. In this Concept Paper, they are considering no longer allowing Canadian companies to report in US GAAP for Canadian Securities purposes. Having heard about this, we thought we would let our comments known to the CSA. Attached is the Question from the Concept Paper, as well as our response.
If this subject is of interest to you, we highly recommend that you read the Concept Paper. Should this concern you, we recommend that you let your thoughts known to the CSA – the deadline for comments is April 13, 2008.
__________________________________________________________________
Question: Do you agree we should not allow a SEC issuer to use US GAAP for financial years beginning on or after January 1, 2009, with the exception that a SEC issuer filing US GAAP financial statements in Canada for its most recent financial year ending on or before December 31, 2008, could continue doing so until 2013? If not, why do you disagree, and how, if at all, would you modify existing rules?
Answer:
No, we do not agree.
Reason 1. We disagree for sound business reasons. While Canada is choosing an honourable position to converge accounting standards internationally, Canadian companies continue to access significant capital in the Unites States. Companies currently choose to report in US GAAP for business reasons – mostly because investors in the United States prefer to invest in companies that report in US GAAP. Taking away the opportunity for Canadian companies to report only in US GAAP would only be increasing their costs by having to report in IFRS for Canadian purposes and US GAAP (chosen for appropriate access to capital markets).
Reason 2. We have found the SEC decision to accept IFRS for foreign issuers a great step towards the admirable goal of one GAAP acceptable worldwide. It is important to note that winds of change continue to blow through the United States, from internationalist to protectionist and back again. Considering the speed in which the SEC has moved towards acceptance of IFRS for foreign issuers, we are concerned that political events could cause the SEC to change its mind just as quickly on the acceptance of IFRS for foreign issuers. Because of this risk, Canadian companies must be able to choose to continue to report in US GAAP.
We would not propose to modify existing rules for reporting in US GAAP.
Friday, December 7, 2007
Accounting Standards: USA vs. World (rest of the)
Convergence is the name of the game for standards in many industries, and the Accounting industry is no different.
Up till now, different countries around the world have had their own accounting standards, reflecting an introspective view of the world. As economies around the world focus more on globalization, the ability to understand financial information from different countries has taken on a greater significance.
GAAP (Generally Accepted Accounting Principles) are the standards by which accountants prepare financial information. GAAP is converging, and is on the road to being one GAAP worldwide.
IFRS (International Financial Reporting Standards) is the global accounting standard that is being accepted in more and more countries around the world. Europe integrated their standard to IFRS in 2005. Canada is set to accept IFRS to replace their accounting standards in 2011, and other countries around the world, including Japan and India, are getting with the program.
The major holdout, no surprise, is the USA.
However, something shocking happened a few weeks ago. The SEC (Securities and Exchange Commission) in the United States said that they will accept IFRS reporting for foreign private issuers (public companies from outside of the USA listed in the USA).
Not only that, but the FASB (the US Accounting Standards Board) and the IASB (makers of IFRS), are working jointly on some projects of significance, ensuring that some standards will be the same worldwide.
As Canada is getting ready for IFRS for 2011, we are too. Some of our clients are hiring right now for this convergence project. We are talking about IFRS, and are presenting at conferences across Canada in 2008 - We presented earlier this week in Toronto.
You may be asking yourself (or me) “who cares”. And that’s fair. GAAP isn’t an exciting topic (at least it is not supposed to be). Accountants care. Their world is converging.
Is this a good thing? I think so, because I’m a believer in the positive impact of economic globalization. More convergence on standards means less confusion on understanding others financial information. And this small part can assist in growing global economic health, which in the end makes the world a better place.
Up till now, different countries around the world have had their own accounting standards, reflecting an introspective view of the world. As economies around the world focus more on globalization, the ability to understand financial information from different countries has taken on a greater significance.
GAAP (Generally Accepted Accounting Principles) are the standards by which accountants prepare financial information. GAAP is converging, and is on the road to being one GAAP worldwide.
IFRS (International Financial Reporting Standards) is the global accounting standard that is being accepted in more and more countries around the world. Europe integrated their standard to IFRS in 2005. Canada is set to accept IFRS to replace their accounting standards in 2011, and other countries around the world, including Japan and India, are getting with the program.
The major holdout, no surprise, is the USA.
However, something shocking happened a few weeks ago. The SEC (Securities and Exchange Commission) in the United States said that they will accept IFRS reporting for foreign private issuers (public companies from outside of the USA listed in the USA).
Not only that, but the FASB (the US Accounting Standards Board) and the IASB (makers of IFRS), are working jointly on some projects of significance, ensuring that some standards will be the same worldwide.
As Canada is getting ready for IFRS for 2011, we are too. Some of our clients are hiring right now for this convergence project. We are talking about IFRS, and are presenting at conferences across Canada in 2008 - We presented earlier this week in Toronto.
You may be asking yourself (or me) “who cares”. And that’s fair. GAAP isn’t an exciting topic (at least it is not supposed to be). Accountants care. Their world is converging.
Is this a good thing? I think so, because I’m a believer in the positive impact of economic globalization. More convergence on standards means less confusion on understanding others financial information. And this small part can assist in growing global economic health, which in the end makes the world a better place.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)